SNL Weak Writing Hurts Mescal

Protolize 𝕯𝖎𝖌𝖎𝖙𝖆𝖑 𝕸𝖊𝖉𝖎𝖆

You need 3 min read

·

Post on Dec 09, 2024

29 visitor like this post

Share

SNL Weak Writing Hurts Mescal

Paul Mescal, the breakout star of "Aftersun" and "God's Creatures," graced the Saturday Night Live stage recently. However, his hosting gig was unfortunately overshadowed by a common SNL problem: weak writing. While Mescal's charm and undeniable talent shone through, the subpar sketches failed to provide him with the platform he deserved, leaving many viewers disappointed. This article will delve into why the writing let Mescal down and what it reveals about the current state of SNL.

The Problem with the Sketches: A Lack of Freshness and Bite

The sketches presented during Mescal's episode lacked the sharp wit and originality that once defined Saturday Night Live. Many felt they were stale, relying on tired tropes and predictable jokes. This isn't a new criticism of the show; SNL has faced accusations of declining quality for years. But in Mescal's case, the weak material actively hindered his ability to showcase his comedic range. A talented performer like Mescal deserves sketches that are clever, surprising, and allow him to play with different character types. Instead, he was often relegated to reacting to underdeveloped premises.

Missed Opportunities: Underutilized Talent

Mescal is known for his intense and nuanced performances in dramatic roles. SNL had a golden opportunity to leverage this strength, perhaps by placing him in sketches that played with the contrast between his serious screen persona and comedic potential. Instead, the sketches felt generic, failing to capitalise on his unique qualities. The writing didn't provide the necessary springboard for him to demonstrate his comedic timing or improvisational skills. It was a missed opportunity for both Mescal and the show.

The Impact on Viewership and SNL's Reputation

The underwhelming sketches during Mescal's episode undoubtedly affected viewership. Many viewers took to social media to express their disappointment, highlighting the subpar writing as the main culprit. This negative feedback further reinforces the concerns about SNL's declining quality and its struggles to consistently deliver engaging content. A strong host like Mescal deserves better; his presence deserved to be amplified by exceptional material, not dragged down by it.

The Larger Issue: SNL's Creative Stagnation?

Mescal's experience points to a larger issue plaguing SNL: a perceived lack of creative energy and innovation. The show needs to revitalize its writing room, bringing in fresh perspectives and voices to combat the reliance on outdated formulas. The constant churning of cast members hasn’t necessarily translated into better writing, suggesting that a systemic issue is at play.

Moving Forward: A Call for Improvement

For SNL to maintain its relevance and attract viewers, it needs to prioritize strong, original writing. This isn't just about finding funny jokes; it's about creating sketches with compelling narratives, memorable characters, and sharp social commentary. Only then can talented hosts like Paul Mescal truly shine and the show live up to its legacy. The future of SNL depends on it. The writing needs a serious overhaul to give both the cast and the hosts the chance to truly impress. Mescal's performance, despite the weak writing, proves that the talent is still there; the show just needs to catch up.

Keywords: SNL, Paul Mescal, Saturday Night Live, weak writing, sketches, comedy, television, review, criticism, underwhelming, missed opportunities, creative stagnation, viewership, decline, talent, host.