Poor SNL Writing Hurts Mescal

Protolize 𝕯𝖎𝖌𝖎𝖙𝖆𝖑 𝕸𝖊𝖉𝖎𝖆

You need 3 min read

·

Post on Dec 09, 2024

29 visitor like this post

Share

Poor SNL Writing Hurts Mescal: A Rising Star's Uninspired Debut

Paul Mescal, the breakout star of Normal People and Aftersun, recently graced the Saturday Night Live stage. However, his hosting debut was met with mixed reactions, largely due to the subpar writing that hampered his performance. This wasn't a case of Mescal lacking talent; rather, it highlights a concerning trend of inconsistent quality in SNL's writing, especially when it comes to showcasing new talent.

The Problem with the Sketches

Several sketches fell flat, failing to utilize Mescal's charisma or comedic timing effectively. Instead of showcasing his range, the writing often relied on tired tropes and predictable punchlines. This wasn't simply a matter of a few weak sketches; the overall quality was consistently underwhelming, leaving viewers and critics alike disappointed.

Lack of Strong Character Development

Many sketches suffered from a lack of strong character development. Mescal, known for his nuanced performances in dramatic roles, was given one-dimensional characters to portray. Without compelling character arcs or insightful dialogue, even his strong comedic delivery couldn't save the material. This is a critical flaw in SNL writing; strong character development is essential for memorable sketches, regardless of the host.

Repetitive Jokes and Weak Premises

The jokes often felt repetitive and lacked originality. Several sketches relied on tired comedic formulas, offering little in the way of fresh perspectives or surprising twists. Weak premises further hampered the sketches, failing to set up any meaningful comedic scenarios. This reliance on predictable humor undermines the potential of talented hosts like Mescal.

A Missed Opportunity

Mescal's hosting gig represented a significant opportunity for SNL to introduce a new generation of viewers to his considerable talents. Instead, the weak writing overshadowed his performance, leading many to question whether the show is properly utilizing its platform to showcase emerging stars. The potential for memorable moments and viral clips was squandered due to a lack of investment in quality writing.

The Broader Implications for SNL

Mescal's experience highlights a larger issue facing SNL: the inconsistent quality of its writing. While the show has produced iconic moments and launched numerous successful careers, it also suffers from periods of creative stagnation. This inconsistency can hurt both established cast members and guest hosts, undermining their performances and potentially damaging the show's overall reputation.

The Need for Fresh Perspectives

SNL needs to actively seek out fresh perspectives and voices in its writing room. A diverse range of writers can bring new ideas and approaches to the show, preventing the reliance on tired tropes and predictable humor. Investing in new talent is crucial for maintaining the show's relevance and appeal.

Balancing Classic SNL with Modern Humor

Finding the right balance between classic SNL humor and modern comedic sensibilities is key. While respecting the legacy of the show, writers need to adapt to evolving comedic tastes and cultural contexts. This involves exploring new comedic styles and incorporating diverse perspectives into the show's writing.

Conclusion: A Call for Better Writing

Paul Mescal's SNL appearance wasn't a failure due to his own performance. Instead, it serves as a stark reminder of the importance of strong writing in showcasing comedic talent. SNL's future success depends on its ability to consistently deliver high-quality sketches that challenge, surprise, and entertain viewers. Until the writing improves, even the most talented hosts will struggle to shine. The show needs to prioritize investing in its writing staff to ensure that future guest hosts, and the cast itself, have the material they deserve. Only then will SNL truly live up to its potential.